🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios introduced a new game mode called Relaxed Breakthrough. In essence, this option mirrors the regular Breakthrough format but includes a few notable adjustments:

• Every squad has just eight real players, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Activities performed by real players grant complete experience points, while bot actions provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Elements like Dogtags, achievements, and career stat updates are disabled.

So essentially, this mode delivers on its name: it's a casual version of Breakthrough. On the surface, you might think there's nothing wrong, since it gives additional choices for gamers looking for different methods to have fun with the title. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it's that not everyone will be happy. In other words, many Battlefield 6 players are mad.

Player Reactions: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," states one reply to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing idea," says another. Meanwhile, on the Battlefield subreddit, a player notes, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," and another lists everything they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's enjoyable to warm up, human participants prevent it from being a complete grind but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds another. One reply on Twitter explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is great for me," and another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Feedback

Despite the support, there are valid points to complain about the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it will make wait times even longer for different playlists because of the sheer number of options in the game already. On a similar note, certain regions often face mostly bots in the existing playlists. It also seems a little backwards that the mode won't start without a minimum number of real players, even though it primarily centers on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major complaints is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that got canned when they attempted to eliminate XP farming from the system. So this new playlist feels like the player base meeting them halfway, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I had great enjoyment in the initial release, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Be Made?

If the development team has demonstrated something so far with Battlefield 6, it is that they're paying attention and acting on feedback. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, if their data indicates this new playlist isn't performing to their expectations, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.