The Documentary Legend reflecting on His War of Independence Project: ‘We Won’t Work on a More Important Film’
Ken Burns is now considered more than a documentarian; he is a brand, a one-man industrial complex. Whenever he releases documentary series arriving on the television, everybody wants a part of him.
The filmmaker completed “an astonishing number of podcasts”, he remarks, nearing the end of his extensive publicity circuit that included 40 cities, dozens of preview events plus countless media sessions. “I think there are 340.1m podcasts, one for every American, and I’ve done half of them.”
Happily Burns is a force of nature, as loquacious behind the mic as he is productive in the editing room. The 72-year-old has traveled from historical sites to popular podcasts to promote his latest monumental work: his Revolutionary War documentary, a monumental six-part, 12-hour documentary series that consumed ten years of his career and arrived this week on public television.
Defiantly Traditional Approach
Comparable to methodical preparation amidst instant gratification culture, The American Revolution proudly conventional, more redolent of historical documentary classics as opposed to modern online content new media formats.
However, for the filmmaker, whose professional life exploring national heritage including baseball, country music, jazz and national parks, the nation’s founding transcends ordinary historical coverage but foundational. “I said this to my co-director Sarah Botstein recently, and she concurred: no future work will carry greater importance,” Burns states during a telephone interview.
Extensive Historical Investigation
Burns and his collaborators and screenwriter Geoffrey Ward utilized thousands of books and primary source materials. Multiple academic experts, covering various ideological backgrounds, provided on-air commentary in conjunction with distinguished researchers representing multiple disciplines such as enslavement studies, indigenous peoples’ narratives plus colonial history.
Characteristic Narrative Method
The film’s approach will feel familiar to devotees of The Civil War. The unique approach featured gradual camera movements across still photos, extensive employment of contemporary scores featuring talent reading diaries, letters and speeches.
This period represented Burns built his legacy; a generation later, currently the elder statesman of documentary filmmaking, he seems able to recruit any actor he chooses. Collaborating with the filmmaker at a recent event, renowned playwright Lin-Manuel Miranda noted: “Nobody declines an invitation from Ken Burns.”
Remarkable Ensemble
The decade-long production schedule provided advantages concerning availability. Recordings took place at professional facilities, in relevant places through digital platforms, an approach adopted throughout the health crisis. Burns explains collaborating with actor Josh Brolin, who made time during his travels to perform his role as George Washington then continuing to his next engagement.
Brolin is joined by Kenneth Branagh, Hugh Dancy, Claire Danes, Jeff Daniels, Morgan Freeman, Paul Giamatti, Domhnall Gleeson, Amanda Gorman, Jonathan Groff, multiple generations of actors, celebrated film and stage performers, Damian Lewis, Laura Linney, Tobias Menzies, skilled dramatic performers, Wendell Pierce, Matthew Rhys, Liev Schreiber, Dan Stevens, Meryl Streep.
Burns emphasizes: “Truly, this might be the most exceptional group gathered for any production. They do an extraordinary service. Their celebrity status wasn’t the criteria. I got so angry when somebody said, ‘So why the celebrities?’. I explained, ‘These are artists.’ They are among the world’s best performers and they vitalize these narratives.”
Nuanced Narrative
Nevertheless, the lack of surviving participants, modern media forced Burns and his team to rely extensively on primary texts, weaving together personal accounts of numerous historical characters. This approach enabled to present viewers not only to the “bold-faced names” of that era along with multiple crucial to understanding, several participants remain visually unknown.
Burns also indulged his personal passion for maps and spatial representation. “I love maps,” he comments, “and there are more maps in this project compared to previous works across my complete filmography.”
International Impact
The production crew recorded across multiple important places throughout the continent plus English locations to capture the landscape’s character and collaborated substantially with living history participants. These components unite to depict events more bloody, multifaceted and world-changing compared to standard education.
The film maintains, was no mere parochial quarrel over land, taxation and representation. Instead the film portrays a violent confrontation that eventually involved multiple global powers and unexpectedly manifested termed “mankind’s greatest hopes”.
Civil War Reality
Early dissatisfaction and objections aimed at the crown by American colonists throughout multiple disputatious regions rapidly became a brutal civil conflict, setting brother against brother and turning communities into battlegrounds. During the second installment, the historian Alan Taylor observes: “The main misapprehension concerning independence struggle centers on assuming it constituted that unified Americans. This omits the fact that it was a civil war among Americans.”
Historical Complexity
For him, the revolution is a story that “typically is drowning in sentimentality and nostalgia and lacks depth and insufficiently honors actual events, every individual involved and the widespread bloodshed.”
The historian argues, a movement that announced the world-changing idea of inherent human rights; a bloody domestic struggle, separating rebels and supporters; and a global war, another installment in a sequence of wars between imperial nations for control of the continent.
Contingent Historical Events
Burns also wanted {to rediscover the